Ontario's Radical Sex Ed Curriculum
http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Sex_Ed_Curriculum
FOR OUR CHILDREN’S PURITY AND SAFETY FOR OUR CULTURAL AND HUMAN DIGNITY WE MUST ACT TOGETHER
Kathleen Wynne is the premier of Ontario who pushes upon your child a new radical SEX ED CURRICULUM (including Ontario Catholic Schools) for SEPTEMBER 2015. This new curriculum is a crime against our children, our families, our rights, our cultures and religions, our moral values
DON’T HAVE CHILDREN? THINK ABOUT YOUR NEPHEWS AND NIECES, SISTERS AND BROTHERS; THINK ABOUT GRAND CHILDREN AND THE WHOLE SOCIETY.
EXCERPTS FROM THE 2015 SEX DECAY CURRICULUM:
taken from: https://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Sex_Ed_Curriculum
Grade 1 (AGE 6): “Genitalia & consent”: Graphic lesson on sexual body parts including "penis", "testicles", "vagina" and "vulva. Teaching of "enthusiastic sexual consent" will be weaved throughout the sex-ed curriculum, beginning in grade 1.
Grade 2 (AGE 7): “Gender as a changeable social construct”: Will teach the disputed theory of "gender identity" as if it were fact. This is the notion that any little boy can decide that he is actually a girl and vice versa, gender is merely a “social construct.” In result, serious sexual confusion in the mind of children is very real! Gender Identity theory is not science-based teaching, but rather a dangerous socio-political philosophy that seeks to normalize a mental disorder. Gender identity confusion is still recognized by the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic & Statistics Manual as a "gender dysphoria" disorder.
This ideology being foisted on school children by the Wynne government aims to indoctrinate the next generation into believing that transgenderism/ transsexualism is an innate, genetic characteristic just like skin colour or race.
Grade 3 (AGE 8): “Homosexuality”: Without regard for the religious/moral beliefs of families, the curriculum will normalize homosexual family structures and homosexual "marriage" in the minds of 8-year-olds. Aggressively undermine the beliefs of traditionally-principled families. Kathleen Wynne government show no respect, nor tolerance for traditionally-principled families.
Grade 4 (AGE 9): “Romantic dating”: Will introduce children to the idea of being “more than just friends” with classmates whom they may “like”. Many parents would find that introducing this idea at age 9 is not age-appropriate. In the context of the other controversial lessons, plus the curriculum’s connections to a confessed child pornographer and to unsavoury groups who promote anal play, group sex, sadism/masochism, and bondage, parents are prudent to see a red flag here.
Grade 6 (AGE 11): “Masturbation”: Regardless of what any person's moral stance is on that practice, the curriculum, encourages it as a "pleasurable" way for children to learn about their bodies. All fair-minded people should agree that the government has no business actively promoting/encouraging 11 year olds to masturbate. In addition to promoting the practice of masturbation, the curriculum will teach about "vaginal lubrication". It is unclear how this teaching can possibly be retrofitted with a "Catholic lens" in order to make it suitable for Catholic religious schools.
Grade 7 (AGE 12): “Anal intercourse & Oral Sex”: Under the pretext of encouraging abstinence from behaviours associated with high risk for STDs, the curriculum uses a sleight of hand to sneakily introduce to children the concepts of "anal intercourse" and "oral-genital contact". In another sleight of hand, "anal intercourse" is lumped in as a sexual act of the same kind as vaginal intercourse, with no differentiation between the two types of sexual acts, either morally or with respect to risk for sexually transmitted disease. Was the goal in this sneaky introduction of graphic sex acts to avoid the accusation that the Premier was promoting a gay agenda, seeking to normalize gay sex in the minds of kids?
In fact, anal intercourse is the most efficient method of transmitting the AIDS virus. Epidemiologists still predict that 50% of men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) will eventually contract HIV. So, why exactly does Kathleen Wynne think it’s a good idea to get 12 and 13 year olds thinking about "anal intercourse"?
Grade 7 (AGE 12): “Sexual Pleasure”: Teacher may help 12-yr-olds to appreciate an “understanding of your own body, including what gives you pleasure”.
Grade 8 (AGE 13): "Make a personal plan' about your sexual activity”: It is perverse to suggest to grade 8's that they should make a plan in which they decide how far they're willing to go with sexual activity, and then "stick to what I had planned". Keep in mind that at this age, children cannot legally give consent. It may actually be illegal for adults to instruct underage children to have sex. It is the message to grade 8 kids that "we expect you may be having sex or will very soon". It will put pressure on kids to become sexually active, or encouragement especially for boys, who are curious, to go ahead and do so. A 2014 poll of UK teens conducted by the Institute of Public Policy Research shows that a large majority of both boys & girls complained that sex education often presents promiscuity as normal, putting additional pressure on them to become sexually active before they might otherwise do so.
Grade 8 (AGE 13): “Keep a condom with you”: Children will be taught to keep a condom on their person in case there's a chance "they will be having sex sometime soon". This will leave the impression with kids that we adults expect they are now having sex. For some, it might even be felt as pressure to become sexually active. For some kids, this will arouse curiosity to try things sooner than they would have planned to on their own. It is a recipe for launching children into a lifestyle of promiscuity.
It's important to know that this curriculum was also written under the direction of a confessed child sex predator, Mr. Benjamin Levin. He was the Deputy Education Minister at the time, serving under then Education Minister Kathleen Wynne.
Should warning bells be going off when we learn that an alleged pedophile oversaw the writing of curriculum which gets 6 year olds talking about their genitals, encourages kids to masturbate, and wants to get 13 year olds thinking about oral sex and anal sex? The safety of children is too important to ignore Levin's hand in this curriculum.
Now the media is talking about sex-ed, and how much teachers should present to our children, and not about the Wynne government’s possible criminal activity (read more on the website). Wynne is now taking questions about consent, instead of answering questions about whether she should resign.
WHAT TO DO?
1/ Go to http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Sex_Ed_Curriculum => to learn how and why the curriculum is promoted, and its impact. Learn how to fight it and follow the steps described there with your friends and families.
2/ Share this information with all your school teachers, churches, friends, neighbours, co-workers – everyone you know. Let them read the detailed description of the curriculum and steps how to fight it! The main reason this is happening is people silence because of lack of information, and lack of unity in actions. SO LET’S BE INFORMED AND LET’S UNITE!
2/ Sign on-line petitions and using auto-email tool, contact your local MPP on this sites: http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Sex_Ed_Curriculum => go to bottom of the page “Help Us Warn Parents.” => “12 ways to fight Kathleen Wynne’s radical sex-ed”
www.Change.org =>!!!STOP Ontario’s Radical Sex Ed Curriculum NOW!!!; www.lifesitenews.com => 10 ways you can STOP Premier Wynne's sex-ed; http://canadianvalues.ca/ICV/protectourchildren/
3/ Support one courageous father from Hamilton, who has made a tremendous personal sacrifice and initiated legal action to fight sex-ed being forced on his children. As a result, he has been slandered and viciously attacked by local media. At present, his case is at a severe disadvantage, but if he wins this legal action, he will protect our parental rights too; it will set a precedent that all school boards will be bound to follow. Read more on how to help here: http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Hot+News&id=247
2015 SCHOOL YEAR IS COMING... NO TIME TO WASTE ... ACT NOW!
FOR OUR CHILDREN’S PURITY AND SAFETY FOR OUR CULTURAL AND HUMAN DIGNITY WE MUST ACT TOGETHER
Kathleen Wynne is the premier of Ontario who pushes upon your child a new radical SEX ED CURRICULUM (including Ontario Catholic Schools) for SEPTEMBER 2015. This new curriculum is a crime against our children, our families, our rights, our cultures and religions, our moral values
DON’T HAVE CHILDREN? THINK ABOUT YOUR NEPHEWS AND NIECES, SISTERS AND BROTHERS; THINK ABOUT GRAND CHILDREN AND THE WHOLE SOCIETY.
EXCERPTS FROM THE 2015 SEX DECAY CURRICULUM:
taken from: https://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Sex_Ed_Curriculum
Grade 1 (AGE 6): “Genitalia & consent”: Graphic lesson on sexual body parts including "penis", "testicles", "vagina" and "vulva. Teaching of "enthusiastic sexual consent" will be weaved throughout the sex-ed curriculum, beginning in grade 1.
Grade 2 (AGE 7): “Gender as a changeable social construct”: Will teach the disputed theory of "gender identity" as if it were fact. This is the notion that any little boy can decide that he is actually a girl and vice versa, gender is merely a “social construct.” In result, serious sexual confusion in the mind of children is very real! Gender Identity theory is not science-based teaching, but rather a dangerous socio-political philosophy that seeks to normalize a mental disorder. Gender identity confusion is still recognized by the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic & Statistics Manual as a "gender dysphoria" disorder.
This ideology being foisted on school children by the Wynne government aims to indoctrinate the next generation into believing that transgenderism/ transsexualism is an innate, genetic characteristic just like skin colour or race.
Grade 3 (AGE 8): “Homosexuality”: Without regard for the religious/moral beliefs of families, the curriculum will normalize homosexual family structures and homosexual "marriage" in the minds of 8-year-olds. Aggressively undermine the beliefs of traditionally-principled families. Kathleen Wynne government show no respect, nor tolerance for traditionally-principled families.
Grade 4 (AGE 9): “Romantic dating”: Will introduce children to the idea of being “more than just friends” with classmates whom they may “like”. Many parents would find that introducing this idea at age 9 is not age-appropriate. In the context of the other controversial lessons, plus the curriculum’s connections to a confessed child pornographer and to unsavoury groups who promote anal play, group sex, sadism/masochism, and bondage, parents are prudent to see a red flag here.
Grade 6 (AGE 11): “Masturbation”: Regardless of what any person's moral stance is on that practice, the curriculum, encourages it as a "pleasurable" way for children to learn about their bodies. All fair-minded people should agree that the government has no business actively promoting/encouraging 11 year olds to masturbate. In addition to promoting the practice of masturbation, the curriculum will teach about "vaginal lubrication". It is unclear how this teaching can possibly be retrofitted with a "Catholic lens" in order to make it suitable for Catholic religious schools.
Grade 7 (AGE 12): “Anal intercourse & Oral Sex”: Under the pretext of encouraging abstinence from behaviours associated with high risk for STDs, the curriculum uses a sleight of hand to sneakily introduce to children the concepts of "anal intercourse" and "oral-genital contact". In another sleight of hand, "anal intercourse" is lumped in as a sexual act of the same kind as vaginal intercourse, with no differentiation between the two types of sexual acts, either morally or with respect to risk for sexually transmitted disease. Was the goal in this sneaky introduction of graphic sex acts to avoid the accusation that the Premier was promoting a gay agenda, seeking to normalize gay sex in the minds of kids?
In fact, anal intercourse is the most efficient method of transmitting the AIDS virus. Epidemiologists still predict that 50% of men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) will eventually contract HIV. So, why exactly does Kathleen Wynne think it’s a good idea to get 12 and 13 year olds thinking about "anal intercourse"?
Grade 7 (AGE 12): “Sexual Pleasure”: Teacher may help 12-yr-olds to appreciate an “understanding of your own body, including what gives you pleasure”.
Grade 8 (AGE 13): "Make a personal plan' about your sexual activity”: It is perverse to suggest to grade 8's that they should make a plan in which they decide how far they're willing to go with sexual activity, and then "stick to what I had planned". Keep in mind that at this age, children cannot legally give consent. It may actually be illegal for adults to instruct underage children to have sex. It is the message to grade 8 kids that "we expect you may be having sex or will very soon". It will put pressure on kids to become sexually active, or encouragement especially for boys, who are curious, to go ahead and do so. A 2014 poll of UK teens conducted by the Institute of Public Policy Research shows that a large majority of both boys & girls complained that sex education often presents promiscuity as normal, putting additional pressure on them to become sexually active before they might otherwise do so.
Grade 8 (AGE 13): “Keep a condom with you”: Children will be taught to keep a condom on their person in case there's a chance "they will be having sex sometime soon". This will leave the impression with kids that we adults expect they are now having sex. For some, it might even be felt as pressure to become sexually active. For some kids, this will arouse curiosity to try things sooner than they would have planned to on their own. It is a recipe for launching children into a lifestyle of promiscuity.
It's important to know that this curriculum was also written under the direction of a confessed child sex predator, Mr. Benjamin Levin. He was the Deputy Education Minister at the time, serving under then Education Minister Kathleen Wynne.
Should warning bells be going off when we learn that an alleged pedophile oversaw the writing of curriculum which gets 6 year olds talking about their genitals, encourages kids to masturbate, and wants to get 13 year olds thinking about oral sex and anal sex? The safety of children is too important to ignore Levin's hand in this curriculum.
Now the media is talking about sex-ed, and how much teachers should present to our children, and not about the Wynne government’s possible criminal activity (read more on the website). Wynne is now taking questions about consent, instead of answering questions about whether she should resign.
WHAT TO DO?
1/ Go to http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Sex_Ed_Curriculum => to learn how and why the curriculum is promoted, and its impact. Learn how to fight it and follow the steps described there with your friends and families.
2/ Share this information with all your school teachers, churches, friends, neighbours, co-workers – everyone you know. Let them read the detailed description of the curriculum and steps how to fight it! The main reason this is happening is people silence because of lack of information, and lack of unity in actions. SO LET’S BE INFORMED AND LET’S UNITE!
2/ Sign on-line petitions and using auto-email tool, contact your local MPP on this sites: http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Sex_Ed_Curriculum => go to bottom of the page “Help Us Warn Parents.” => “12 ways to fight Kathleen Wynne’s radical sex-ed”
www.Change.org =>!!!STOP Ontario’s Radical Sex Ed Curriculum NOW!!!; www.lifesitenews.com => 10 ways you can STOP Premier Wynne's sex-ed; http://canadianvalues.ca/ICV/protectourchildren/
3/ Support one courageous father from Hamilton, who has made a tremendous personal sacrifice and initiated legal action to fight sex-ed being forced on his children. As a result, he has been slandered and viciously attacked by local media. At present, his case is at a severe disadvantage, but if he wins this legal action, he will protect our parental rights too; it will set a precedent that all school boards will be bound to follow. Read more on how to help here: http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Hot+News&id=247
2015 SCHOOL YEAR IS COMING... NO TIME TO WASTE ... ACT NOW!
Сейчас разрешают забирать детей с этих уроков, через 2 года запретят или перестанут оглашать родителям, когда этому будут учить. И так учебников нет, что в каком классе учат только узнаешь только пост-фактум.
И еще те,кто пошел на урок-будут чувствовать себя взрослее,лучше:), а если ваш 1 не пойдет-его же "заклюют"-не боитесь????
И КАК вы проконтролируете,что ваш не проник в класс на этот урок?????
Не ради срача спрашиваю! Интересно послушать мам-противниц такого просвещения.
Спросила её, в какой момент будут предупреждать и спрашивать согласие родителей. Она очень удивилась вопросу, говорит, что оно не требуется. В 5-м классе раньше рассылали информационное письмо, что будут подробно учить анатомию, с новой прораммой будут продолжать делать то же самое. Спросила её, как насчёт:
“It’s actually in the Education Act that a parent has the right to withdraw their child from content they don’t want their child to receive,” Education Minister Liz Sandals said in an interview. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/law-allows-parents-to-opt-out-their-children-from-controversial-ontario-sex-education-curriculum
Она просто первый раз об этом слышит :). Начала на меня наезжать, что внимательно ли я читала разосланную методичку, и желаю ли счастья своему ребёнку. Она много лет работает директором, никто из responsible parents таким образом ни разу не забирал ребёнка с уроков. Получается, опция такая есть, а практически воспользоваться ей нельзя. Я в печали. Как узнать, что начинается программа и каким образом информировать школу, что мы не участвуем? И такое не только в нашей школе, уточните в своих, по идее, везде то же самое.
Винн надо метлой гнать из офиса как можно скорее, один вред от нее по всем направлениям. Хорошо хоть обязательный пенсионный фонд онтарио еще не успела создать, благодетельница наша.
Я просто в шоке от постановки вопроса в заглавном посте:"FOR OUR CHILDREN’S PURITY AND SAFETY FOR OUR CULTURAL AND HUMAN DIGNITY WE MUST ACT TOGETHER"
перебор
ПС Вспомнился анекдот с баяном. Кончается он так: " А сейчас мы будет называть писю членом и лечить Вашего сына от сифилиса..."
Как вы общаетесь с детьми 6-10 лет?
" Дорогой, ты уже помыл свой член?" или " Маня, ты идёшь мыть вагину?" Так это ТЕПЕРЬ звучит в вашем, новом мире?